Most articles about U.S. inflation don’t mention U.S. inflation. That’s because they focus on price changes not the amount of Federal Reserve “dollars” in existence. The powers-that-be wanted to hide their devaluation of the money by simply changing the definition of the word most used to complain about the devaluation of the money. That word is “inflation.”
There may be articles about increases in the quantity of dollars, which is the real inflation, but most of the articles won’t use the word inflation. The authors might just be noting the change, without stating how an increase will harm anyone holding dollars. That is that an increase in dollars steals value from anyone holding dollars.
Take for example this Bloomberg article with the headline “Where’s the inflation?” The article states,
The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that overall consumer prices were down 0.2 percent in July from a year earlier, driven largely by a sharp decline in oil prices. Even after stripping out food and energy, prices were up 1.8 percent — or 1.2 percent, according to the Fed’s preferred measure, produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. That’s well below the central bank’s longer-term target of 2 percent.
The article is supposed to be about inflation, yet it focuses on prices changes. It also mentions the two percent inflation target of Federal Reserve, which is really a price change target.
They have done a good job of distracting attention away from the issuing of new dollars. And they need to do this because inflation was 14 percent in 2012 and is now about 7 percent in 2015. (See charts). Inflation is so bad that in just seven years, the banks (working with borrowers) doubled the number of dollars in existence. This means that the value of the dollar will soon be half of what it would have been if those new dollars had not been issued. That’s why a lunch sandwich costs about $10 when it used to cost five dollars about seven years ago, wouldn’t you say?
If you want to reach about inflation, visit this site, not Bloomberg or most of the corporate media. You should note that many media companies are owned by companies that want low interest rates on loans. Interest rates can be low if the banks are simply creating the money. If the banks actually had to borrow the money from someone else, than interest rates would rise and loans would cost more.
Updated charts for U.S. annual inflation appear below. For the last 12 months, inflation has been 7.3 percent, based on a 12 month moving average. That is lower than the prior period which had an 8.2 percent increase and much lower than 2012’s increase of 14 percent. Yikes!
If you’re not making 7.3 percent more than last year, than you are likely WORSE off because the value of the dollar has or will go down about 7.3 percent, all other things being equal. Now if people from other countries suddenly want more dollars, than the value of the dollar may not fall the full 7.3%; the value could even go up. However, the value will be 7.3 percent lower than what it would have been if Federal Reserve had not created more dollars. Note, all the entities that took out loans are equally responsible since Fed Reserve banks only created dollars when they loaned them out.
The chart below shows that numbers of dollars doubled in just seven years, two years faster than the prior doubling.
Here is the data driving the charts.
Doubling. It’s something that one can understand quickly. The Federal Reserve banks have doubled the number of dollars in just seven years – 2008 to 2015. That was three years faster than the previous doubling and seven years faster than the doubling before that. Inflation is picking up.
When there are twice as many dollars, than prices will be twice as much as they would have been had the quantity stayed the same. This is because the value of ANYTHING is based on supply and demand. When the supply doubles and demand is the same, then the value of the item is worth has as much; think of a glut in oranges and the price of oranges falls.
When prices double, that means your salary and savings are worth half as much as they would have been if Federal Reserve had not increased the quantity.
The annual increases in the dollar quantity of Federal Reserve dollars continues to decrease. Last month’s update showed a 7.5% increase compared to 12 months ago, whereas this month’s update shows an 7.4% increase, using data through July 2015. The annual change last year was 8.5% and the year before was 10.2%. (The increases are based on a 12 month moving average.) Everyone is focused on the changing interest rates, instead of just looking at the actual changes in the money quantity that show Federal Reserve is already applying the brakes to the economy. How can they do this? The banking system is a cartel. Almost all banks are part of the Federal System. We have this situation because the federal departments taxed the alternatives out of existence. See the updated charts showing the Quantity of Fed Reserve Dollars and the Annual Percentage Changes in the Quantity.
Many financial analysts wonder whether Fed Reserve will raise interest rates, but the actual increase or decrease in dollars may be more important. The chart below shows that Fed Reserve has slowed the issuing of new dollars for the past three years. For the 12 months ending June 2015, Fed Reserve issued 7.5 percent more dollars, whereas the 2014 increase was 8.3 percent, and the 2013 increase was 10.5%. Since the 7.5 percent increase is a smaller increase than past years, any increase in economic activity is likely to be less than past years.
A recession can happen even if Fed Reserve issues more dollars. Though if the pace slows, then less economic activity might happen versus past years, and some businesses or business projects may fail if the business managers expect the higher growth of past years.
The total quantity of dollars has doubled during the past seven years. This was two years faster than the prior doubling. This might be due to the size of the bank and business mistakes that helped cause the recent great recession. Bigger mistakes require bigger infusions of new dollars. Of course, Fed Reserve could have let those businesses fail since they made mistakes, but it’s a rigged market and the politically and financially connected often come out on top.
People use different ways to calculate the quantity of Federal Reserve U.S. dollars. At Monetary Choice, the inputs are:
Currency in Circulation + Checking Deposits + Savings Deposits + U.S. Government Demand Deposits and Note Balances + Demand Deposits Due to Foreign Commercial Banks + Demand Deposits Due to Foreign Official Institutions.
The first three comprise 99 percent of the dollars:
We include savings deposits because the money can be easily moved into a checking deposits from which it could be spent.
See more info about our tracking of Federal Reserve U.S. Dollars.
One way to try to forecast booms and busts is to look at changes in the quantity of dollars in circulation. More dollars, means more loans, and more jobs but also more inflation and lower valued salary. As of May, 2015, the quantity of dollars increased about 8 percent versus last year, but this increase was a little less than the prior annual increase and the increases have been declining. Fewer dollars means fewer loans and less business transactions BUT also less inflation and a higher value salary, if you still have a job.
It’s not hyper-inflation, but it is inflation. The number of dollars in circulation doubled in just seven years. This means the value of dollars from 2008 are now worth half as much as they would have been had Fed Reserve and U.S.Gov not issued the new dollars. The seven year pace is faster than the prior doubling that took nine years. The new dollars are loaned to the U.S.Gov to cover the budget deficit.
The Swiss central bank recently stopped devaluing their currency, which is great news for everyone but currency traders and people who live on the dole. However, this article and many others espouse the harmful myth that a strong franc hurts exporters, since their goods become more expensive in other currencies. This only applies to greedy exporters. The rational exporters will LOWER their prices since the franc is more valuable.
Let’s say I’m selling a watch for 10,000 francs, and each franc is worth one ounce of oil. This means I’m getting paid 10,000 ounces of oil. If the franc rises 30 percent in value, than each franc will be worth 1.3 ounces of oil, and now I’m selling my watch for the equivalent of 13,000 ounces of oil, which makes my watch over-priced, since comparable watches still only cost 10,000 ounces of oil.
I MUST lower the Swiss Franc price for my watch to about 7,700 francs, which returns the REAL (not nominal) price to 10,000 ounces of oil. Then my sales will remain the same.
Any action by the Swiss central bank merely requires a price change. I must focus on the value of money, not the quantity of money. As I like to say, don’t count your money. Value it.
See article on Economic Policy Journal
An article on Seeking Alpha reported that the people living in Switzerland rejected a measure that would have forced the “central bank” to have on hand enough gold to represent 20 percent of outstanding francs. In an ideal world, there would be 100 percent backing, and as reported in the article, the Swiss franc recently had 40 percent backing. The measure also would have required all Swiss gold to be moved back to the country.
The article did note that the referendum raised awareness about money and gold. It’s a long road back to monetary sanity, and this referendum was an important step.